The Unintended Impact of Helmet Use on Bicyclists' Risk-taking Behaviors
Abstract: Bicycle helmet compensation effects suggest that bicyclists offset perceived gains in safety from wearing a helmet by behaving more aggressively. A better understanding of these compensation effects can be useful in assessing mandatory legislated helmet use laws. Using a sample of 131 bicyclists, this research studies how bicyclists respond with respect to risk-taking behaviors under various urban-street conditions, as a function of helmet use. Study participants are each shown 12 videos, shot in Berkeley, California, from the perspective of a bicyclist riding behind another bicyclist. A fractional factorial experiment design is used to systematically vary contextual attributes, such as speed, bike lane facilities, on-street parking, passing vehicles, etc., across the videos. After each video, participants are asked to indicate if they would overtake the bicyclist in the video. With the help of data adaptive estimation techniques, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) is applied to estimate the average risk difference between helmet users and non-users, controlling for self-selection effects. Individual-based nonparametric bootstrap is performed to assess the uncertainty associated with the estimator. Our findings suggest, on average, helmet users are 15.6% more likely to overtake, and the effect is statistically significant using the non-parametric bootstrap sampling evaluation. This study serves as a cautionary warning that road safety programs may need to consider strategies in which unintended impact of bicycle helmet use can be mitigated.
Machine Learning Meets Microeconomics: The Case of Decision Trees and Discrete Choice
Abstract: In the 1960's, the logistic regression model from statistics and the binary probit model from psychology were linked with random utility theory, thereby connecting such methods with economic theory. Since then, the fields of statistics, computer science, and machine learning have created numerous methods for modeling discrete choices. However, these newer methods have not been derived from or linked with economic theories of human decision making. We believe this lack of economic interpretation is one reason discrete choice modelers have been slow to adopt these newer methods.
Our paper begins bridging this gap by providing a microeconomic framework for decision trees: a popular machine learning method. Specically, we show how decision trees represent a non-compensatory decision protocol known as disjunctions-of-conjunctions and how this protocol generalizes many of the non-compensatory rules used in the discrete choice literature so far. Additionally, we show how existing decision tree variants address many economic concerns that choice modelers might have. Beyond theoretical interpretations, we contribute to the existing literature of two-stage, semi-compensatory modeling and to the existing decision tree literature. In particular, we formulate the rst bayesian model tree, thereby allowing for uncertainty in the estimated non-compensatory rules as well as for context-dependent preference heterogeneity in one's second-stage choice model. Using an application of bicycle mode choice in the San Francisco Bay Area, we estimate our bayesian model tree, and we find that it is over 1,000 times more likely to be closer to the true data-generating process than a multinomial logit model (MNL). Qualitatively, our bayesian model tree automatically finds the effect of bicycle infrastructure investment to be moderated by travel distance, socio-demographics and topography, and our model identies diminishing returns from bicycle lane investments. These qualitative differences lead the bayesian model trees to produce forecasts that directly align with the observed bicycle mode shares in regions with abundant bicycle infrastructure such as Davis,CA and the Netherlands. In comparison, the forecasts of the MNL model are overly optimistic.
Seasonality Effect on US Household Demand for Different Beef Cuts
Ardeshiri and Swait
Abstract: Australia is one the largest exporters of beef and beef products to the United States (Haley & Jones, 2017). A better understanding of the American demand for beef is important since Australia is facing strong competition from Canada and New Zealand in the beef market. We applied a discrete choice experiment to investigate 946 American consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for different beef products. Consumers were presented with a novel experiment in which they indicated “how many” they would purchase for ground, diced, roast, and six cuts of steaks (sirloin, tenderloin, flank, flap, New York and cowboy/rib-eye).
The results from a scaled adjusted ordered logit model showed that after price, cues related to safety option purchases such as certified logo, type of packaging, antibiotic free and organic products play a stronger influential role on American consumers’ decision making (especially in summer where the opportunities for foodborne bacteria to thrive in warm weather is higher) compared to other beef attributes.
Furthermore, on average US consumers purchase diced and roast products more often in winter “as a slow cooked season” than in summer whereas New York strip and flank steak are more popular in summer as “the grilling season” than in winter.
Finally, this study provides managerial and policy implication and recommendations to help Australian exporters to better understand US consumer preferences for beef through an understanding of seasonal effects on demand for this good.
Flexible mixture - Amount Models for Business and Industry using Gaussian Processes
Ruseckaite, Fok and Goos
Abstract: Many products and services can be described as mixtures of ingredients whose proportions sum to one. Specialized models have been developed for linking the mixture proportions to outcome variables, such as preference, quality and liking. In many scenarios, only the mixture proportions matter for the outcome variable. In such cases, mixture models suffice. In other scenarios, the total amount of the mixture matters as well. In these cases, one needs mixture-amount models. As an example, consider advertisers who have to decide on the advertising media mix (e.g. 30% of the expenditures on TV advertising, 10% on radio and 60% on online advertising) as well as on the total budget of the entire campaign. To model mixture-amount data, the current strategy is to express the response in terms of the mixture proportions and specify mixture parameters as parametric functions of the amount. However, specifying the functional form for these parameters may not be straightforward, and using a flexible functional form usually comes at the cost of a large number of parameters. In this paper, we present a new modeling approach which is flexible but parsimonious in the number of parameters. The model is based on so-called Gaussian processes and avoids the necessity to a-priori specify the shape of the dependence of the mixture parameters on the amount. We show that our model encompasses two commonly used model specifications as extreme cases. Finally, we demonstrate the model’s added value when compared to standard models for mixture-amount data. We consider two applications. The first one deals with the reaction of mice to mixtures of hormones applied in different amounts. The second one concerns the recognition of advertising campaigns. The mixture here is the particular media mix (TV and magazine advertising) used for a campaign. As the total amount variable, we consider the total advertising campaign exposure.
Modeling and Forecasting the Evolution of Preferences over Time: A Hidden Markov Model of Travel Behavior
El Zarwi, Vij and Walker
Abstract: Preferences, as denoted by taste parameters and consideration sets, may evolve over time in response to changes in demographic and situational variables, psychological, sociological and biological constructs,and available alternatives and their attributes. However, existing representations typically overlook the influence of past experiences on present preferences. This study develops a hidden Markov model with a discrete choice kernel for modeling and forecasting the evolution of individual preferences over time. The hidden states denote different latent preferences, and the evolutionary path is hypothesized to be a first order Markov process such that an individual’s preferences during a particular time period are dependent on their preferences during the previous time period. The framework is applied to study the evolution of modal preferences, or modality styles, over time, in response to a major change in the public transportation system. Empirical findings reveal two complementary narratives. At the population level, there are significant shifts in the distribution of individuals across modality styles before and after the change in the system, but the distribution is relatively stable in the periods after the change. At the individual level, greater instability in preferences is observed, much after the change, despite accounting for the inertial influence of past preferences. A comparison between the proposed dynamic frameworkand comparable static frameworks reveals corresponding differences in aggregate forecasts for different policy scenarios, demonstrating the value of the proposed framework for both individual and population level policy analysis.