Jump to Content

Academic Board

July 2004
by Peter Cardwell


Academic Board endorsed a draft UniSA submission to the South Australian Certificate of Education (SACE) Review, which will be refined by the Vice Chancellor, the Pro Vice Chancellor (Access and Learning Support) and the Chair of Academic Board before being forwarded to the Review Secretariat.

Members noted that in February 2004, the SA Government announced an external review of the SACE. Subsequently, the Vice Chancellor informed staff of a process that would allow for University-wide consultation to prepare a response to the review. The Chair, Assoc Prof Adrian Vicary, reported that consultations were then held on each campus and led by himself and the Pro Vice Chancellor (Access and Learning Support). Divisions were asked to discuss the SACE Review Issues Paper at Divisional Board level, and staff were invited to send their comments to a specially-created web site on the University’s home page.

Following the consultation process a draft submission to the SACE Review was prepared, focussing on four areas: English as a compulsory requirement for Stage 2 SACE; the internationalisation of the SACE; the relationship between the SACE and the TER; and the relationship between SSABSA and the South Australian universities.

Academic Board supported the arguments addressed in the draft University submission to the SACE Review. There was a long discussion that concentrated on a number of issues including:

New scholarships: Whyalla

The Acting Director for Regional Engagement and Dean of Whyalla Campus, Assoc Prof Adrian Viacry, introduced a proposed new Northern Interests Outback Communities Development Scholarship, which will be sponsored by Northern Interests Pty Ltd to the value of $10,000. It would be available annually for one full-time undergraduate student enrolled in any UniSA program who could demonstrate a link between their studies and the development of outback communities in South Australia. Members welcomed the new scholarship. Following discussion, the proposal was approved in principle subject to further information on the eligibility criteria being provided to the August meeting of Academic Board.

top^