Jump to Content

< back

Surface chemistry in mineral flotation

Project duration: 2002-2006

Funding: NSERC (Canada) Discovery Grant
Chief Investigators: Roger Smart, Brian Hart, Mark Biesinger (Surface Science Western, Uni Western Ontario)

Description:

Surface chemistry is the principal determinant of the average contact angle for a specific mineral phase in a flotation pulp. The average contact angle is, in turn, the principal determinant of the bubble-particle attachment efficiency in the overall collection efficiency from which the flotation rate constant can be determined.

 

The recovery and selectivity in sulfide flotation is ultimately dependent on the relative rate constants of the different mineral phases. But the average contact angle is not only mineral-specific, based on a statistical average of the mineral particles in that phase, but also the contact angle for each particle is some sort of average of hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas across the particle surface. There is even evidence that these areas can be face-specific. Determination of this hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance by particle therefore requires selection of the particular mineral phase and statistical analysis of the particles with an estimation of the spread of values. This is a tall order in a flotation pulp containing many different mineral phases, different particle sizes of individual phases, adsorbed and precipitated species (often colloidal), and oxidised products.

Diagnosis of the surface chemical factors playing a part in flotation separation of a value sulfide phase then requires measurement of the species that are statistically different between the concentrate and tail streams together with an estimate (if possible) of the magnitude of the differences. The statistical methods described here, based on time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), have gone some way towards this ultimate aim.

Objectives:

The overall objective is to develop a quantitative ToF-SIMS measure of the difference between flotation characteristics of particles of the same mineral phase in concentrate vs. tail streams incorporating all statistically significant hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity factors.

The basic science to achieve this has 3 parts.

The full methodology will then be tested for prediction of both recovery and selectivity on specific separations, e.g. pentlandite/pyrrhotite; sphalerite/pyrite; chalcopyrite/galena/pyrite.

Anticipated Significance:

The outcomes targeted would be to use this information to: optimise separation due to chemical surface conditioning (eg addition rates, conditioning times, stage addition, alternative reagents, depressant suppression etc) and; to find where surface chemical discrimination is no longer statistically significant down a flotation bank.

We have some preliminary results in the latter category indicating that the surface chemistry of a fourth concentrate in a galena flotation was not statistically different from that in the tail. This implies that grade losses would be incurred.

Overall, there is potential to use this information to design flotation testing for improved selectivity based on statistically significant factors discriminating positive and negative flotation for different mineral phases.




top^