Jump to Content

Media Release

December 8 2006

Academic critical of work and family report

A response to Balancing Work and Family: Report on the inquiry into balancing work and family, House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Family and Human Services, December 2006


Commenting on today’s report, Professor Barbara Pocock, Director of UniSA’s Centre for Work and Life and author of The Labour Market Ate My Babies – Work, Children and a Sustainable Future, says the recommendations are a disappointment.

“If adopted, these recommendations would be very damaging for Australia. They go in the wrong direction,” Prof Pocock says.

“The report names the problems very well but then doesn’t deal with them in any substantive way, except to propose childcare tax breaks. The recommendations do not deal with the key issues for working parents, including:

•  long hours, finding family time and having some say over working hours
•  the absence of paid maternity leave for two-thirds of Australia’s women
•  and the lack of good quality, affordable care for all our children – not just those who can afford a nanny.

“This proposal keeps the problems of working parents private and assumes they are all about money. It would deliver only for the rich and leave the rest behind.

“It is very unfortunate that the recommendations offer nothing substantive on the issues of paid parental leave and rights to request to work part-time, at a time when so many other countries are recognising the need to act.”

Prof Pocock says of particular concern is the recommendation for a special visa category for immigrant workers to do Australia’s childcare.

“A new immigrant group of low paid au pairs is no way to solve Australia’s childcare problems, and no way to support working women,” she says.

“The report seems to suggest that all of the problems of working parents are solved through tax deductibility for childcare. Such a measure would increase demand but do nothing for the quality of childcare or its supply (including the supply of qualified workers and decent pay). It would quite probably make the problems worse rather than better. And along the way it will greatly advantage the rich, while delivering nothing to low and middle income earners.

“If the government were to adopt this report, it would be walking away from any of the real issues facing working carers.”

Professor Barbara Pocock is available for interview from 4pm today, Friday Dec 8 on 0414 244 606
 


Media contact

top^