Jump to Content

< back

Can we define let alone fix, 'dangerous' climate change?

Professor Stephen H. Schneider

Professor Stephen H Schneider

Adelaide Thinker in Residence
Melvin and Joan Lane Professor for Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies;
Professor, Department of Biological Sciences;
Co-Director, Centre for Environmental Science and Policy at the Stanford Institute for International Studies,
Stanford University U.S.A.
http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu

Abstract
The phrase "dangerous anthropogenic interference" (DAI) may be defined or characterised in terms of the consequences (or impacts) of climate change outcomes, which can be related to the levels and rates of change of climate parameters. These parameters will, in turn, be determined by the evolution of emissions and consequent atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. In addition, scenarios of social and economic development influence adaptive capacity of various sectors and regions, which, in turn, influences impact magnitudes and climate change thresholds that might be labelled "DAI".
Evaluating the consequences of climate change outcomes to determine those that may be considered "dangerous" is a complex undertaking, involving substantial uncertainties as well as value judgments. Probabilistic estimation is an important method to treat such uncertainties. This task inevitably involves a mix of objective and subjective probability measures. What integrated assessment modelling can do to help explicate this important scientific and political question is an issue that will be explored in this presentation.

top^