California Household Travel Survey 2012:
Tour mode choice data from the San Francisco Bay Area
This data was originally collected as part of the California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) in the year 2012. Individuals belonging to sampled households were asked to report their complete activity diary data over an observation period of one day, including which activities were conducted where, when, for how long, with whom and using what mode of travel. More information on the raw data can be found in NuStats, LLC (2013).
The data included here corresponds to individuals from the subset of households located in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area. The raw trip data was processed into home-based tours that can be used for the purpose of tour-based travel mode choice analysis. The resulting dataset includes 27,054 tours made by 17,717 individuals from 8,228 households.
For each tour, six possible travel mode alternatives are defined: private vehicle, private transit, walk to public transit, drive to public transit, bike, and walk. Private vehicle refers to cases where the individual used a motorized vehicle owned by themselves (or someone they know) as a driver or a passenger. Private transit includes the use of travel modes such as taxis, Uber, carshare, rental cars and private shuttles. Walk to public transit captures all cases in which an individual only used non-motorized travel modes to access public transit, and drive to public transit captures all cases in which a motorized travel mode was used to access public transit.
The level-of-service attributes, namely travel times and costs, for each of the six travel modes for each tour are determined using network skims from the SF MTC for 2010, generated using version 3 of their travel demand model. We are unable to decompose travel time into its constituent elements, such as in-vehicle time and waiting time, as this information was unavailable at the time of processing. Travel costs are in 2000 US dollars.
The download link below contains five files: the processed data file, the Python script used to process the raw data, an iPython notebook included as an example on how to use the data file for analysis, the data dictionary for the raw data and a readme file.
A subset of this data was originally used by Vij et al. (2017) for understanding modal preference shifts in the San Francisco Bay Area over time. For more details, please refer to the original study. And if you have any questions, feel free to contact Akshay.Vij@unisa.edu.au.
Nustats, LLC, 2013. 2010–2012 California Household Travel Survey Final Report.
Vij, A., Gorripaty, S., & Walker, J. L. (2017). From trend spotting to trend’splaining: Understanding modal preference shifts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 238-258.
Areas of study and research
- Health Research
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA)
- Centre for Cancer Biology
- Centre for Drug Discovery and Development
- Centre for Population Health Research
- Centre of Research Excellence for the Prevention of Chronic Conditions in Rural and Remote High Risk Populations
- International Centre for Allied Health Evidence
- Medicine and Device Surveillance CRE
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre
and Social Sciences
- Art, Architecture and Design
- Communication, International Studies and Languages
- Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy
- Hawke Research Institute
- Asia Pacific Centre for Work Health and Safety
- Australian Centre for Child Protection
- Barbara Hardy Institute
- Centre for Research in Education
- Hawke EU Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence
- Centre for Islamic Thought and Education
- International Centre for Muslim and non-Muslim Understanding
- Research Centre for Languages and Cultures
- Zero Waste SA Research Centre for Sustainable Design and Behaviour (sd+b)
IT, Engineering and
- Future Industries Institute
- UniSA College